There have been many conspiracy theories about 9/11 but this is one of the most compelling evidence that I've seen by far about how the 9/11 planes may be holographic projections. Watch the video and form your own opinion.
Why is this video footage compelling? If this video was not tampered with any editing software, then this video is an important piece of evidence that the planes are not real. They are merely holographic projections that were created to give you an impression that the planes flew into the Twin Towers. My opinion that they are holographic is based on 2 facts that can be seen on the video :
(a) the left wing of the plane mysteriously disappeared as the plane was approaching the building. Did the thick black smoke coming from the left side of the plane partly blocked the holographic projection of the plane? That would have meant that the source of the projection is from the sky. Do note however that this could be an optical illusion caused by the video camera itself
(b) there is no shadow of the plane on the building itself. Do note that there is a strong source of light coming from the right side of the plane, therefore some shadow of the plane should be visible on the building. This is how I usually separate fake UFO videos from the authentic ones. I look for shadows and reflections. Where the placement of shadows or reflections are wrong or not visible, these are usually fake videos. No visible shadow of the plane on the building suggests that this plane is fake, probably a damn good holographic projection.
(c) this point was shared by a reader from the comments section and I'm sharing it here as it is a brilliant point. "But the surest way to know that no 767-sized plane flew through there at 580 MPH is the complete lack of disturbance to the smoke-filled air. We should've seen a massive disturbance of the air from the tornado-like horizontal vortices created by the wings of big planes, known as wake turbulence. These vortices are so powerful, this is why other planes always wait at least 3 mins before taking off behind another big plane, as these vortices are powerful enough to cause a crash.'
Can we achieve such great clarity using holographic technology? Check out this video.
Quite cool Star Wars technology right? Not exactly the same as 9/11 if the planes were indeed holographic but do bear in mind that this is a commercial holographic projection designed for CNN. There could be better and more advanced technology that we don't know about.
How about a live video footage of a holographic plane caught in Madrid, Spain caught in July 2010?
What's real? You decide. As Fox Mulder would say :
those planes were holographic. 911 was an inside job. no plane hit the pentagon. osama bin laden was fabricated. the three towers collapsed due to controller demolition. less damage was doen to the pentagon becaus ethe government didnt want to completly destroy it. the real palnes may never have existed or may have been flown out and detonated over sea.
ReplyDeleteThis is one of the strongest theory that we have for 911 by far. All the evidence just doesn't make sense. At the end of the day, we need to be logical and make a reasonable deduction based on actual facts. We need to examine the data. As Sherlock Holmes said, when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
DeleteThe 'fact' that aviation fuel burned the structural foundation of the two towers had been debunked by experts. Basically, fire can't burn steel to the ground. Videos have shown images of the planes that appeared to be holographic in nature. Then, you have several witnesses popping up in interviews that the buildings were going to collapse. How did they know this? These are just random people on the ground near the towers.
If those planes were holographic, then it had to be projected from the sky as the buildings surrounding the towers would block a complete projection. A projection of that magnitude is something that we have not seen before.
No matter what the theories may be, my heart goes out to the victims on the planes and those who perished in the towers. I hope we will be able to find the answers soon enough.
The truth is out there.
You are all stupid, stop asking me to open my eyes and see "what's realy going on" Please learn to spell before posting replys. You all make my head hurt. Go outside for a walk and stop beliving everything has a secret behind it. Durp.
DeleteAs much as I do not agree with your choice of words, I do support your right to share your views. This is a public forum, my blog and everyone is entitled to their views. All that we ask is to examine the facts presented to the public and make a proper deductions from these facts.
DeleteThe truth is out there.
I agree. The "No Planes Theory" has received a lot of criticism because of its attachment to disinfo-agent Simon Shacks theory that ALL the videos were "fake." In other words, real planes put into fake footage. But the truth is that MOST of the videos, especially the amateur videos, have not been altered, and it's real footage with a "fake" (holographic) plane. This is why the plane looks fake in (most of) the videos. If it had been all "video-fakery," then the planes would've looked real, and not like a projected shadow. Also, many of the strange "birds" seen were holographic--I've concluded this thru observing the fact that these images look like flat, 2-D shadows when seen against a building or other flat, solid surface, but then look 3-D when seen in the sky.
ReplyDeleteAlso, if the planes had been drones, like most people think--and what I thought myself at first--then the plane(s) would've also been painted-up to match the aircraft they were impersonating.
But the surest way to know that no 767-sized plane flew thru there at 580 MPH is the complete lack of disturbance to the smoke-filled air. We should've seen a massive disturbance of the air from the tornado-like horizontal vortices created by the wings of big planes, known as wake turbulence. These vortices are so powerful, this is why other planes always wait at least 3 mins before taking off behind another big plane, as these vortices are powerful enough to cause a crash.
We must put to rest this "it was all video-fakery" disinfo. Sure, there's been some manipulation of videos, esp. the Pentagon "security camera" videos--indeed, I show this in one of my own videos. But most of the amateur footage from NY is genuine.
Also, the disappearing wing can't be a trick of the camera because it can be seen to happen in both front AND side shots from different cameras! Indeed, the entire plane, from side shots, begins to look very strange and 'rubbery,' its tail section dipping downward, as it's about to "hit" the Tower.
I believe the holographic-like projection (it's not a normal hologram, but some type of advanced, secret technology and a hologram is simply the closest thing we can compare to this illusion) probably came from another plane, and if you look, you can see this plane flying by in the distance in some videos. I think this is why many of the MSM videos have a hazy background, unlike the clear blue skies seen in most amateur videos; the MSM videos clouded the background to hide this other plane, as well as some of the other weird effects of these holographic projections, like the strange "darkbirds," which, I believe, were somehow linked to the projection of the plane.
I'm glad to see people using critical thinking for a change, instead of merely dismissing something because we the public aren't familiar with the technology. The video-fakery idea is absurd, of course, because eye-witnesses also needed to be fooled. The holographic theory explains why both cameras and people saw the same thing--a black, fake-looking plane. Now, it's possible that the holographic plane was hiding a small, hardened drone or missile. Indeed, it's possible that the hologram was generated around this small missile-like drone. This eliminates the need for any external projection, and also explains the sound--although the sound could've easily been generated in a number of ways, and while most of the visual part of the amateur videos haven't been manipulated, it would be far easier to alter just the sound on some videos. If it had been a 767, the sound should've been much louder. Many people reported hearing no jet sound.
Thank you for sharing! The theory about complete lack of disturbance to the smoke-filled air is just brilliant. We're just examining facts here and things just don't add up. What worries me and I believe I'm not alone in this is that fact 9/11 was the precursor to the state of terrorism that we're in and wars that probably couldn't had been justified if 9/11 did not happen.
DeleteWho would benefit the most from 9/11? Defense contractors? Companies tasked with rebuilding war torn countries? Profits from oil robbed from these countries? Or does it runs deeper than that?
The truth is out there.
Not only does one wing disappear in both front & side-shot videos, but watch the vertical stabilizer seem to "shift" from side to side in the above video! And, as I already mentioned, in the side-shot videos, the entire tail section seems to warp and droop down.
ReplyDeleteAlso, if a missile was the basic for the construction of the illusion, then the only parts that needed to be generated would've been the wings, part of the tail section, and the engines. A Tomahawk missile, which travels at 560 MPH (which is in the range of the reported speed of 560-586 for the object) does have some small wings, and also something like a tail-fin/stabilizer. This explains the lack of crash impact from wings, while also explaining the part where it does look like something did impact the Tower. The missile would also explain the sound. My guess is that there was a jet-fuel bomb ignited at the same time (maybe by the impact of missile) to get the desired effect of black smoke & smell of jet fuel, etc. But one can also see white smoke being omitted from explosives/and/or incendiaries which were generating far more heat.
I don't know why some people think this is such a "far-out" theory! People know that magicians like David Copperfield, Chris Angel, & David Blaine, to mention a few, can completely fool people's eyes & ears, cameras, etc. to an extraordinary degree, but somehow can't accept that military/intelligence institutions like DARPA, with near limitless resources & complete secrecy, can't do the same, when they have technology that's 30 to 50 years ahead of anything most people in the public sector can't even imagine!
Thank you for sharing. After the dust has settled and facts examined, everything just does not add up. Bearing in mind 9/11 was the precursor, an impetus that started the whole war on terror which spanned so many countries and delivered unnecessary body counts on both sides.
DeleteWas it purely for financial gains (reconstruction of war torn countries, oil etc) or is there a more sinister end game that we have not seen yet? Please do note the body of the so-called Osama bin Laden was never shown to the public but his 'execution' was dramatized so much in the press and media. They even made a movie out of it!
My only fear is that there is a darker, more sinister end game to all of this and we will find out about it soon. Will it be too late for us?
The truth is out there.
Why isn't anyone concerned about this? Thank God someone realizes the Bin Laden bull crap. We are getting so stupid, while 100's of tons of alluminum is being dumped on us thru chemtrails, massive dosages of fluoride being fed to us.
Delete. Agenda 21, because the more educated you are , the more resources you use, so destroy their brains, and cause infertility.
The mind accepts what it sees, very rarely does it ventures further than that. It is really up to us to examine the facts carefully and decide what truly happened. A lot is at stake here, especially since a few countries have been invaded and occupied since 9/11
Delete